Corporation-Startup Collaboration: Barriers and solutions (part 8.)

After the corporation and the startup have established a relationship, mutual trust and both parties are interested and willing to move forward, the collaboration moves to a deeper level. This phase, where the relationship is implemented and concretized, is a more formal stage that requires various internal, legal and technical assessments. The main goals of this phase are to discuss terms and conditions of the collaboration and to build a contract.

Implementing the relationship is often a lot of work for startups, especially since their working culture is some what leaner and faster compared to that of a corporation's. The slowness of this process on the corporate side, concluding agreements and assessments and going through all the details regarding IPs and liabilities, can create some hick-ups for the collaboration.

The assessment processes of startups, called for by corporations, may require the startup to produce vast documentation that is still inexistent, in order to pass all the financial and legal appraisals. These processes are time consuming for the corporate as well, because they have to review the provided information and evaluate the company's liabilities and assets to be able to give the final go ahead for the collaboration.

At this stage it is not unlikely for the other party, usually the corporate side, to ask for a non disclosure agreement - this can sometimes create additional speed bumps. NDAs consume a lot of legal resources that startups may not have. In the worst case scenario, the startup is spending scarce resources even before the collaboration is officially agreed upon. On the other hand, some large companies can be reluctant to sign NDAs if they already possess much intellectual property in that specific area, because it can be very arduous to go through every detail to avoid any conflicts of interest and risks of being sued.

Intellectual properties then, can be a bit of a pain without an agreement and issues regarding intellectual property can make it very hard to continue collaborating. Often a whole bunch of other issues like contract development, indemnities, warranties, exclusivities and publishing, are attached to negotiations on IP issues. At this stage it is key for the startup to know when they should seek for legal advice.

Often startups are worried that the large corporation is going to steal their IP, because the startup lacks understanding of all the legal procedures. The reality however is that whilst startups in many cases have intangible assets and it's reasonable to be protective of them, instances where the corporate partners mislead the startup are very, very rare. It is a lot more common that the implementing of the relationship falls apart due to the lack of disclosure. In the case of any dispute the likelihood of working through it increases, when the relationship is already based on mutual trust. With broader contractual issues, it is important to know when to seek legal help. Unfortunately this is a stage where many cash-starved startups are tempted to cut back on.

Understandably, it is not the corporation's responsibility to offer advice to startups making sure they know what they're getting into, but encouraging startups to seek independent legal advice is in the long term in the interest of both parties. Seeking peer-support from other startups and asking for advice can help simplify the whole process and reduce legal costs.

It's important to carefully consider the ownership of the IP and the rights to use it, because it can confer a competitive advantage. If the result of the collaboration is the creation of a product with unique characteristics that's very attractive to customers, ownership of the IP or the exclusive right to use it, provides protection for the investment made. It can also be useful for the startup to look up model agreements or ask advice from other startups. For example, agreements where funds are released in stages, are very popular among investors as a way of managing risk and speeding the decision-making but can in fact be very damaging to startups on the grounds that it restricts the startups' freedom to pivot and experiment, focusing the attention on short term goals.


How Some of the Most Successful Corporates Are Making Startup-Collaboration Work?

In our last blog post we went through a few common ways how corporations collaborate with startups. This week we thought we’d go through some success cases from around the globe to showcase how large corporations such as BMW, Accenture, GE and Twitter have turned startup collaboration and partnerships into big success cases.

BMW & Moovit - Investment

The Global car giant BMW has an investment branch, called the iVentures. They also have initiatives for pilots and accelerator programs as ways of including startups in their business development. In 2015 BMW’s iVentures invested in an Israeli startup called Moovit, and BMW sure is happy that they did, because this investment ended up being one of its big success stories. iVentures has helped Moovit expand their global reach and strengthen BMW’s involvement in the innovative mobility service markets.

Moovit is a multi-award-winning free smartphone app, that provides accurate and continuously updated information about public transport services. The app uses a database that includes all local public transport timetables, as well as information about other transport options such as taxis, car-pooling and car-sharing services.

After investing in Moovit , BMW integrated its own rideshare feature, DriveNow, to the application. With its investment to Moovit, BMW has reached over 40 million users in over a thousand cities worldwide and at the same time promoted its own services.

Accenture & Anaplan - Partnering up

A couple of years ago, the leading global professional services company Accenture, faced some challenges in its enterprise performance management strategy (EPM strategy). Accenture’s customers were using hundreds of different spreadsheets, which of course, consumed a lot of time and left a lot of room for human error in the processes.

Instead of developing a competing product or licensing one from a competitor, Accenture found a startup that had promising emerging technology that would solve their clients’ problems. They decided to partner up with a startup company called Anaplan. In this partnership, Accenture gives its clients access to Anaplan’s cloud based platform and technology.

Partnering up with Anaplan has provided Accenture’s customers a faster, more flexible and transparent system, that is more scalable. “The reason why Anaplan is key to us—and the reason why we partner with Anaplan—is because they offer adaptive agility and effectiveness for our clients." - Tim Kelly, MD at Accenture Strategy.

GE and Local Motors on a Joint Venture

As mentioned in our previous articles, a joint venture is a form of partnership, that requires more involvement from the corporate side. In 2016 GE, the world’s leading Digital Industrial company and a company called Local Motors, announced a new and radical approach to manufacturing, called Fuse. This approach accelerates product and technology development by combining open innovation and small batch manufacturing.

Fuse is a digital community that convenes entrepreneurs, scientists, coders, engineers and makers around the globe to solve product development challenges. Physical operations take place in micro-factories that focus on prototyping new products and producing small batches fast.

Ge and Local Motor’s venture is looking to take ideas for GE products sourced from Local Motors' online community and speed up the process by which they get made and tested.

Acquisition - Twitter and Periscope

Most entrepreneurs dream about building and finally selling (finding an exit) for their startup. Even though, acquiring a company isn’t the only way of accessing a startups' technology, in some cases it’s the way to go.

In March 2015 Twitter officially announced its January acquisition of a live-streaming app called Periscope, and paid a little under a 100 million dollars for the startup that didn’t even  have a finished product. For Twitter, live streaming was an obvious area to move into, since they had a sense that it would become the next big thing in social media. By acquiring Periscope, Twitter made sure that anyone who wanted to use the app to live stream, needed a twitter account first. The acquisition offered Twitter ready-made technology, as well as Periscope users and in this way strengthened its position as a news-sharing platform.

Want to see how you can collaborate with startups more efficiently and find innovations to help boost you business? Fill out your contact details here, and we’ll contact you and tell you how we can help YOU work with startups!